Baker et al v. Goldman, Sachs & Co. et al
| Janet Baker and James Baker |
| Goldman, Sachs & Co., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and The Goldman, Sachs & Co. L.L.C. |
| 1:2009cv10053 |
| January 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Suffolk |
| Patti B. Saris |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
493
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. "...ORDER: The motion for a new trial and motion for judgment as a matter of law (Docket No. 484 ) is ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as stated." (LaFlamme, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
492
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. "ORDER: The plaintiffs motions (Doc No. 482 , 1:09-cv-10053; Doc. No. 503, 1:10-cv-10932; Doc. No. 515, 1:10-cv-10932) are DENIED." (LaFlamme, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
308
Judge Patti B. Saris: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. After hearing and review of the record, the Court rules on the motions as follows: 1. Defendant Goldman Sachs & Co.s (Goldman) motion for summary judgment on the Baker plaintiffs claims (Doc. No. [1 78], 09-cv-10053) is DENIED. 2. Defendant Goldmans motion for summary judgment on the Roth plaintiffs claims (Doc. No. 133, 10-cv-10932) is DENIED. 3. Plaintiffs Robert Roth and Paul G. Bambergs motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. No. 144, 10-c v-10932) is DENIED. 4. Plaintiffs Janet and James Bakers motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 198 , 09-cv-10053) IS ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The Court DENIES the motion as to Goldmans liability for negligent and intentional misrepresent ation, and under the Massachusetts Unfair or Deceptive Practices Act. The Court ALLOWS the motion as to Goldmans counterclaims against Janet Baker. 5. Plaintiffs Janet and James Bakers motion for summary judgment as to Goldmans third-party complaint (Doc. No. 197, 10-cv-10932) IS ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED as to Goldmans third-party contribution claims. The Court ALLOWS the motion as to Goldmans indemnification claim. (Anderson, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
68
Judge Patti B. Saris: DISCOVERY ORDER entered sustaining in part and denying in part 46 Notice of Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court, filed by James Baker, Janet Baker (Patch, Christine)
|
|
Filing
50
Judge Patti B. Saris: STANDING PROCEDURAL ORDER RE: SEALING COURT DOCUMENTS entered re 48 Motion to Seal Document (Patch, Christine)
|
|
Filing
34
Judge Patti B. Saris: STANDING PROCEDURAL ORDER RE:SEALING COURT DOCUMENTS entered re 32 Motion to Seal (Patch, Christine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
