Giorgio et al v. Clarke et al
| Matthew Giorgio and Colin Traver |
| Harold W Clarke, Louis Spencer, Peter St. Amand, Michael Thompson, Duane MacEachearn, Gary Roden, Lisa Jackson and Steven Duxbury |
| 1:2012cv11171 |
| June 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Norfolk |
| Joseph L. Tauro |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
232
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON FEES AND INTEREST entered For the following reasons Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs, (Doc. 215), is ALLOWED IN PART. Plaintiffs' Motion for Prejudgment Interest, (Doc. 214), is DENIED. (See attached Order) (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
210
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying 128 Motion for New Trial; denying 154 Motion for Reconsideration (Danieli, Chris)
|
|
Filing
209
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. AMENDED JUDGMENT (Danieli, Chris)
|
|
Filing
90
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 65) is ALLOWED in all other respects. Plaintiffs' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment are DENIED (Doc. Nos. 78 & 79). The clerk will schedule an initial pre-trial conference. (Simeone, Maria)
|
|
Filing
37
Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM and ORDER(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
