Moseley v. Spencer et al
| William B Moseley, II |
| Luis S. Spencer, Bruce Gelb, Lynn Cherneski, Paul Visconti, Butler, Wong, Jose Mortinez, Williams, Janet Rodugez, Thomas Tocci, Pamela M O'Dell, Kristen Olihovik, Vidal Osvaldo, Brian M Nano and Sue S Stubbert |
| 1:2015cv13661 |
| October 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 7) is ALLOWED and the filing fee is assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b); This action is DISMISSED in its entirety. (PSSA, 1)
|
|
Filing
6
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 3) is DENIED without prejudice. Within 21 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff either must: ( 1) pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees; or (2) file a renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by his certified prison account statement.Within 42 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint curing the pleading deficiencies in accordance with Rule 8.Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 2) is DENIED. No summonses shall issue pending further Order of the Court. (PSSA, 1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
