Jones v. Revenue Assistance Program
| Paul Jones |
| Revenue Assistance Program, Fontier Communications, Alliance One, Harris & Harris LTD and Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. |
| 1:2015cv14017 |
| December 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Norfolk |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 55 Motion to Dismiss (Caruso, Stephanie)
|
|
Filing
50
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED MEMORANDUM & ORDER entered granting 16 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting in part and denying in part 24 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Leave to File Document ; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/E CF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include - Leave to file granted on (date of order)- in the caption of the document. 1) the motion to dismiss the amended complaint by defendant Revenue Assistance Corporation is ALLOWED, 2) the mo tion to dismiss the amended complaint by defendant Frontier Communications is, with respect to the claims under §§ 227(b)(1)(B) and (b)(1)(C) of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, ALLO WED; but is otherwise DENIED, and 3) the motion to amend the amended complaint by plaintiff is, with respect to the claims against Revenue Assistance Corporation, DENIED as futile; but, with respect to the surviving claims against Frontier Communications, ALLOWED. In addition, plaintiffs claims against defendant Portfolio Recovery Associates, L.L.C. are, in light of his decision not to pursue the claims in the proposed second amended complaint, DISMISSED. So ordered. (Caruso, Stephanie)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
