Cases 1 - 10 of 335
Adrienne Arrington et al v. H.I.G. Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Arrington, Alecia Guarneros, Alexa Sanchez and others
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital Management LLC, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Jones v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Les Paul Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Wyoming, City of, Unknown Party #1 and Anastasia Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff:
PAUL JONES
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Jones v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01416
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. Redbird Medical
as 6:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Redbird Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA
as 2:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Brian Paul Jones
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Overtime Sports, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv30029
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Overtime Sports, Inc., Zack Weiner, Slam Media, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jones et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01019
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones and David Lamb
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 3:2024cv30027
Plaintiff:
Paul Jones
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank, Monarch Recovery Management Inc., Ratchford Law Group P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
