Ntale v. Healey et al
Othuman Ntale and Prince |
Sara Wayland Ellis, Maura Healey, Charlie Baker and Department of Justice |
1:2019cv11046 |
May 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Nathaniel M Gorton |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: PROCEDURAL ORDER entered. Plaintiff must either (1) pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees; or (2) move for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Failure of plaintiff to comply with this directive within 21 days of the date of this Procedural Order may result in the dismissal of this action. Copy sent by first class mail (with blank IFP form) on 5/31/2019 to plaintiffOthuman Ntale, c/o Department of Mental Health, Dr. Solomon Cater Fuller Mental Health Center, 85 E. Newton Street, Boston, MA 02118-2337. (Attachments: #1 IFP application form)(PSSA, 4) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Othuman Ntale.(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.