Whitehead Whitten v. Berryhill et al
| Patricia Whitehead Whitten |
| The Attorney General of the United States and Nancy A Berryhill |
| Social Security Administration |
| 1:2019cv11279 |
| June 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Patti B Saris |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Gwendolyn N.J. Russell on behalf of The Attorney General of the United States (Russell, Gwendolyn) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Gwendolyn N.J. Russell on behalf of The Attorney General of the United States (Russell, Gwendolyn) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Patricia Whitehead Whitten. Nancy A Berryhill served on 7/10/2019, answer due 9/9/2019. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Nancy A Berryhill. Mailed to plaintiff with USM-285 forms, L.R> 4.1, notice to plaintiff for service by USMS, notice for service on United States and courtesy copy of the complaint. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Attachments: #1 notice to plaintiff and LR 4.1)(PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 6 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.The Clerk shall issue a summons for service of the defendant and the plaintiff shall serve the summons, complaint and this Order in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, she may elect to have the United States Marshals Service (USMS) complete service with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. If so asked by the plaintiff, the USMS shall serve copies of the summons, complaint, and this Order upon the defendant as directed by plaintiff. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the USMS all copies for service and for completing a USM-285 form for each party to be served. The Clerk shall provide the plaintiff with forms and instructions for service by the USMS. The plaintiff shall have 90 days from the date of the issuance of the summons to complete service. (PSSA, 4) |
| Filing 5 Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: Procedural Order re Social Security Action entered. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 3 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Patricia Whitehead Whitten.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Patricia Whitehead Whitten. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
