Williams v. Kelley
Michael Williams and Johnson, Michael |
Sheila Kelley |
1:2021cv11583 |
September 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
F Dennis Saylor |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MOTION for Order to Dispense with the Conference Requirement of Local Rule 7.1 by Sheila Kelley.(Blume, Todd) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to January 1, 2022 to File Answer or Responsive Pleading by Sheila Kelley.(Blume, Todd) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd M. Blume on behalf of Sheila Kelley (Blume, Todd) |
Filing 4 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (McManus, Caetlin) |
Filing 3 Filing fee/payment: $ 5.00, receipt number 1BST086637 for #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Phillips, Sophie) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254, filed by Michael Williams.(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.