Lane v. Baker et al
Luanita Lane |
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy, Randi H Goldman, John McCarthy, Jackie Sutton-Wilson, Thelma Baker, Stephanie McCarty, Diana Sutton and Roger Joseph Bertling |
1:2024cv11271 |
May 13, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Angel Kelley |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Copy re #4 Standing Order regarding Motion Practice mailed to Luanita Lane on 5/16/24. (Horvath, Courtney) |
Filing 4 District Judge Angel Kelley: ORDER entered. Standing Order Regarding Motion Practice. (Horvath, Courtney) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Cowan, Nicole) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luanita Lane.(Phillips, Sophie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John McCarthy, Roger Joseph Bertling, Jackie Sutton-Wilson, Stephanie McCarty, Charles D Baker, Thelma Baker, Barbara McCarthy, Diana Sutton, Randi H Goldman, filed by Luanita Lane. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Phillips, Sophie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.