Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Lane v. Children Hospital
as 1:2024cv10627
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Children Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. McCarthy et al
as 1:2024cv10359
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
John McCarthy, Kaplana George, Randi H Goldman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, et al
as 23-1879
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL and CARMEN ADELUTA VESBIANU, MD
Lane v. Boston Children's Hospital, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, SARAH SCHLEGEL, PHA Doctor and TAMARA, HIV/AIDS Specialist
Lane v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, et al
as 23-1878
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL, KAPLAN GEORGE WECELLEY BECEN, JACKIE SUTTON-WILSON and others
Lane v. Boston Public Schools, et al
as 23-1877
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS, DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. K-8 SCHOOL, SCHOOLS TECHBOSTON ACADEMY and others
Lane v. Brigham and Woman Hospital et al
as 1:2023cv11958
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Brigham and Woman Hospital, Kaplan George Wecelley Becen, Jackie Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mendes, et al v. Lane
as 22-1605
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAZMIN MENDES, SABINE TEMPLIER, EVELYN FARRINGTON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LUANITA LANE
Lane v. Brigham and Woman Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv11231
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Brigham and Woman Hospital and Carmen Adeluta Vesbianu, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lane v. Boston Children Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv11230
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Defendant:
Boston Children Hospital, Sarah Schlegel and Tamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
