Jones v. Walgreen Co. et al
Plaintiff: |
Pamela A Jones |
Defendant: |
Walgreen Co., Walgreen Co. Income Protection Plan for Store Managers, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Michael Campbell |
Case Number: |
3:2009cv30004 |
Filed: |
January 15, 2009 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Office: |
Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
County: |
Hampden |
Presiding Judge: |
Kenneth P. Neiman |
Presiding Judge: |
Michael A Ponsor |
Nature of Suit: |
Plaintiff |
Cause of Action: |
Federal Question |
Jury Demanded By: |
42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
April 23, 2012 |
Filing
164
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered denying 159 Motion for Reconsideration. DENIED. Reviewing the history of the ERISA Portion of this case, including the Walgreens' Defendants' sometimes inconsistent responses, the court finds the modest fee award fair and appropriate. So ordered. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
February 23, 2012 |
Filing
158
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: Plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs (Dkt. No. 148 ) is hereby ALLOWED in the amount of $37,500.00. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
July 12, 2011 |
Filing
147
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered. JUDGMENT for defendants. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
February 24, 2011 |
Filing
114
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: Defendant Walgreens motion for summary judgment on Counts I, II, III, and IV (Dkt. No. 73 ) is hereby ALLOWED, and Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on Counts III and IV (Dkt. No. 85 ) is hereby DENIED. In addition, Plaintiffs motion for additional discovery (Dkt. No. 107 ) is DENIED as moot. These rulings dispose of Plaintiffs claims of employment discrimination. It appears that the trial scheduled for April 25 will not go forward. The court will await the status reports from Plaintiff and Defendant Metlife, due on March 4, 2011 before determining the direction of the case. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
July 29, 2010 |
Filing
64
Judge Michael A Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Counts 6 and 10 are ALLOWED. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Counts 5, 7, and 8 are ALLOWED with respect to Plaintiffs claim for emotional distr ess damages, ALLOWED with respect to Plaintiff's allegations that Defendants violated ERISA § 404, DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claim for STD benefits, and ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART with respect to Plaintiff's claim for LTD benefits. The claim for LTD benefits is remanded to Defendant MetLife and stayed for sixty days from the date of this memorandum. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?