Gordon et al v. Napolitano et al
| Clayton Richard Gordon and Preciosa Antunes |
| Janet Napolitano, Eric H. Holder, Jr., John Sandweg, Sean Gallagher, Christopher J. Donelan, Michael G. Bellotti, Steven W. Tompkins, Thomas M. Hodgson and Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. |
| 3:2013cv30146 |
| August 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Springfield Office |
| Franklin |
| Michael A. Ponsor |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, the court hereby ALLOWS Plaintiffs Motions for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 83 & 107 .) The clerk shall set this matter for a status conference on September 15, 2014, at 3:00 p.m., to review Defendants compliance with this order, and to discuss entry of final judgment. It is So Ordered. See the attached memo and order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
88
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 74 Motion for Order to Show Cause. ALLOWED. For the reasons set forth in Dkt.79, Respondents are hereby ordered to provide these three Petitioners with an individualized bond hearing no later than March 28, 2014. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
|
Filing
47
Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S PETITION entered. As follows: In order to avoid needless delay to Plaintiff while this courts more detailed memorandum is prepared, Plaintiffs individual petition for writ of habeas corpus (Dk t. No. 1 ) is hereby ALLOWED, Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 2 ) is DENIED without prejudice, and Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED (Dkt. No. 13 ). Defendants are hereby ordered to grant Plaintiff an individualized bon d hearing within thirty days of this order. Also within thirty days, counsel will file a memoranda on the question of whether it is proper for the court to retain the case to resolve the class-wide allegations. It is So Ordered. See the attached order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
