Woolley v. University of Massachusetts
| Mason Woolley |
| University of Massachusetts |
| 3:2019cv30004 |
| January 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark G Mastroianni |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 41 First REPLY to Response to #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Mason Woolley. (Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 40 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #33 Motion for Leave to File Reply and #38 Motion for Leave to File Page Extensions for Reply. Plaintiff may file a reply brief, not to exceed ten pages in length, no later than March 11, 2019 at 6:00 p.m. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 39 First MEMORANDUM in Support re #38 First MOTION for Leave to File page extension for reply filed by Mason Woolley. (Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 38 First MOTION for Leave to File page extension for reply by Mason Woolley.(Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 35 SUMMONS Returned Executed University of Massachusetts served on 3/4/2019, answer due 3/25/2019. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 37 Motions Taken Under Advisement: #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 36 Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Motion Hearing held on 2/27/2019 re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Mason Woolley. Present: Mr. Woolley pro se pltf, Atty Barton for deft. Court has colloquy with counsel. Exhibits 1, 2 admitted. Court hears argument, takes matters under advisement. One week filing deadline set for five page memo on res judicata. (Court Reporter: Alice Moran at alice.moran@verizon.net.) (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 34 First MEMORANDUM in Support re #33 First MOTION for Leave to File reply filed by Mason Woolley. (Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 33 First MOTION for Leave to File reply by Mason Woolley.(Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 32 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting **COURTROOM LOCATION CHANGE ONLY -- NO CHANGE TO DATE/TIME** Hearing on Motion #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Motion Hearing set for 2/27/2019 at 10:00 AM in Hampden Courtroom before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 31 First MEMORANDUM in Support re #30 First MOTION to Strike #28 Opposition to Motion, filed by Mason Woolley. (Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 30 First MOTION to Strike #28 Opposition to Motion, by Mason Woolley.(Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance by Denise A. Barton on behalf of University of Massachusetts (Barton, Denise) |
| Filing 28 Opposition re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by University of Massachusetts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 10)(Barton, Denise) |
| Filing 27 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction: Motion Hearing set for 2/27/2019 at 10:00 AM in Franklin Courtroom before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 26 AFFIDAVIT of Plaintiff, Mason Woolley for informal service by Mason Woolley. (Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 25 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #23 Motion for Order to accomplish informal service. Plaintiff shall complete informal service of the complaint, his motion for preliminary injunction, and this order on Defendant in the manner proposed in Plaintiff's motion, with the following additional requirements. The individual accomplishing the in-hand informal service shall complete an affidavit detailing the date, time, and manner of service. Plaintiff shall file this affidavit within 24 hours of completion of the informal service. In addition, informal service shall be completed by February 18, 2019. Defendant shall file a response to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction by February 25, 2019. The court will hold a hearing on Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction on February 27, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., in Franklin Courtroom. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM in Support re #23 MOTION for Order to accomplish informal service filed by Mason Woolley. (Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Order to accomplish informal service by Mason Woolley.(Woolley, Mason) |
| Filing 22 Copy re 21 Order on Motion for leave to electronically file Pro Se, mailed to Mason Woolley on 2/4/19. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 21 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #15 Motion for leave to electronically file Pro Se. The court grants permission on the condition that the plaintiff satisfies all applicable training and other requirements for pro se litigants as stated in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, Page 5. The plaintiff is directed to complete the registration form accessible at https://public.mad.uscourts.gov/ecfreg.html (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 20 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Canceling Hearing. Hearing cancelled: January 29, 2019, Status Conference. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 19 Copy re 18 Order, mailed to Mason Woolley on 1/29/19. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 18 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered in part #14 Plaintiff's Motion for Short Order of Notice. Plaintiff has explained that he provided the Marshals with his completed summons and complaint for service on Defendant on January 28, 2019, and there is no indication that this formal service of process has been completed. Nevertheless, he still requests a "Short Order of Notice," seeking an expedited hearing. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)(1), "[t]he court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverse party." The rule does not explain the type of notice that must be provided, but courts have held that something less than formal service of process under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 may suffice. Accordingly, Plaintiff may either: (1) await formal service of process (through the Marshals or otherwise), after which the court will schedule a hearing on Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction once a return of service is filed with the court; or (2) he may seek to provide at least informal service of his Complaint and Motion for Preliminary Injunction on Defendant. If Plaintiff would like to choose the second option, he must file a motion setting forth his proposal for accomplishing informal service. If Plaintiff files and the court grants this motion, the court will then set a time frame for this informal service, provide a deadline for Defendant's response to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, and schedule a hearing on the preliminary injunction request. In addition, even if Plaintiff seeks informal service for purposes of his motion for preliminary injunction, he is still required to complete formal service of process under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 17 Copy re 16 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, mailed to Mason Woolley on 1/29/19. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 16 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #13 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to Reschedule Hearing. In light of Plaintiff's motion, explaining that he has not yet served Defendant with his motion for preliminary injunction and the court's January 22, 2019 order, the status conference scheduled for today is vacated. The court will issue a separate order addressing scheduling. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se by Mason Woolley. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 14 Plaintiff's MEMORANDUM in Support of #5 Memorandum in Support of Motion by Mason Woolley. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 13 Plainiff's MOTION for Extension of time to Reschedule hearing by Mason Woolley.(Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 12 Remark: The plaintiff have informed the clerk's office that his completed Summons, U.S. Marshals Service form, and the complaint have been delivered (in hand) today, to the U.S. Marshals by the plaintiff for service on the defendants. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to University of Massachusetts. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 10 Copy re 9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis mailed to Mason Woolley on 1/24/19. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 9 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. ALLOWED. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing. Status Conference set for 1/29/2019 at 2:00 PM in Franklin Courtroom before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Mason Woolley. Plaintiff shall serve his Complaint, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and this order on Defendant no later than Friday, January 25, 2019. Plaintiff and counsel for Defendant shall appear for a status conference on January 29, 2019 at 2:00 p.m., to discuss scheduling regarding adjudication of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Although Plaintiff attached a Motion for Short Order of Notice to his Memorandum in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Plaintiff has not explained why he believes he is entitled to an emergency or expedited hearing, especially considering that Defendant does not appear to have been served. Nevertheless, any need for accelerated procedures may be discussed at the status conference. (Bartlett, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Mason Woolley.(Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support of Plaintiff's #4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Mason Woolley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Motion for Short Order)(Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Mason Woolley.(Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark G. Mastroianni assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against University of Massachusetts, filed by Mason Woolley. (Attachments: #1 Cover & Category Sheets)(Lindsay, Maurice) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woolley v. University of Massachusetts | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: University of Massachusetts | |
| Represented By: | Denise A. Barton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mason Woolley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
