Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brida v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12202
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Brida
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, The Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services and The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brida v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as MA/1:23-CV-12202
Plaintiff:
Brida and Dawn M. Brida
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, The Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services and The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Foundation, Inc.
Joseph v. The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
as 4:2023cv40120
Plaintiff:
Alana Joseph
Defendant:
The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Suarez v. The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
as 1:2023cv12130
Plaintiff:
Robin Suarez
Defendant:
The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12077
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burak v. The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
as 4:2023cv40105
Plaintiff:
Katherine Burak
Defendant:
The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
