Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Woolley v. University of Massachusetts, Amherst et al
as 3:2024cv30121
Defendant:
Denise Barton, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Jeffrey Silvia and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Mason Woolley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1675
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sosa v. Mass. DOC, et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brida v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv12202
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Brida
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, The Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services and The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Foundation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brida v. Progress Software Corporation et al
as MA/1:23-CV-12202
Plaintiff:
Brida and Dawn M. Brida
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, The Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services and The University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Foundation, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
