Parrillo v. Springfield et al
Plaintiff: Bryonna Parrillo
Defendant: City of Springfield and Leon Davis
Case Number: 3:2022cv30126
Filed: September 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Robertson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Shawn M. O'Connor on behalf of Bryonna Parrillo (O'Connor, Shawn)
January 17, 2023 Filing 12 CONSENT by all parties to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by City of Springfield.. (Kenefick, Tyler)
January 17, 2023 Filing 11 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Kenefick, Tyler)
December 19, 2022 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms shall be filed on or before the close of business on January 6, 2023. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at #www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Rivera, Melissa)
December 19, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference ISSUED: A Scheduling Conference is set for 1/23/2023 at 3:00 PM in Remote Proceeding : Springfield before Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson. Joint Statement due by 1/17/2023. See attached Notice for complete details. If unavailable, counsel shall confer regarding availability, come up with three mutually agreed upon dates and so notify the Court for rescheduling.This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov. (Rivera, Melissa)
November 29, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa C. deSousa on behalf of City of Springfield (deSousa, Lisa)
October 24, 2022 Filing 7 City of Springfield's ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by City of Springfield.(Kenefick, Tyler)
October 24, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Tyler James Kenefick on behalf of City of Springfield (Kenefick, Tyler)
October 18, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Leon Davis served on 10/6/2022, answer due 10/27/2022. (Lavallee, Taylor)
October 17, 2022 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed City of Springfield served on 10/3/2022, answer due 10/24/2022. (Lavallee, Taylor)
September 23, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Danieli, Chris)
September 23, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris)
September 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9511907 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Bryonna Parrillo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Pellegrino, Raipher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parrillo v. Springfield et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryonna Parrillo
Represented By: Raipher D. Pellegrino
Represented By: Shawn M. O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Springfield
Represented By: Tyler James Kenefick
Represented By: Lisa C. deSousa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Leon Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?