Comeau et al v. Town of Webster et al
| Christopher Comeau, High Roller Transport LTD and Roger Comeau |
| Town of Webster Board of Selectmen, Town of Webster Board of Health, Timothy Bent, Thomas Purcell and Town of Webster |
| 4:2011cv40208 |
| October 31, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Worcester Office |
| Worcester |
| Timothy S. Hillman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
District Judge Timothy S Hillman: MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER entered granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Castles, Martin)
|
|
Filing
50
Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 46 Motion to Deem Certain Unanswered Requests for Admissions as Admitted by Town of Webster. (Belpedio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
49
Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered granting 45 Motion to Deem Requests for Admissions as Admitted by Town of Webster. (Belpedio, Lisa)
|
|
Filing
17
District Judge Timothy S Hillman: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as to Counts I, IV (second), VI (first), VI (second), VIII, IX and X.The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts II, III, IV (first), V, VII, XI, XII, XIII, XIV, XV (first), and XV (second). (Castles, Martin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
