Cases 1 - 10 of 13
PURCELL v. THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE et al
as 3:2023cv00311
Petitioner:
THOMAS PURCELL
Respondent:
THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PAROLE and THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HOUTZDALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Troggio v. Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10263
Plaintiff:
Dennis Troggio
Defendant:
Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc., Rodney F. Emery, Ella Neyland and others
Himmelstein v. Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc. et al
as 7:2021cv08649
Plaintiff:
Laura Himmelstein
Defendant:
Steadfast Apartment REIT, Inc., Rodney F. Emery, Ella Neyland and others
Ellen Stokar v. Steadfast Apartment Reit, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01724
Plaintiff:
Ellen Stokar
Defendant:
Steadfast Apartment Reit, Inc., Rodney F. Emery, Ella Neyland and others
Purcell v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2020cv00065
Plaintiff:
Thomas Purcell
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PURCELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13081
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS PURCELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomz Corporation v. Hythe Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Tomz Corporation
Defendant:
Hythe Holdings, Inc. , Astura Medical and Thomas Purcell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
v. Tomz Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv01366
Defendant:
Tomz Corporation, Hythe Holdings, Inc., Astura Medical and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Tomz Corporation v. Hythe Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01368
Plaintiff:
Tomz Corporation
Defendant:
Hythe Holdings, Inc. , Astura Medical and Thomas Purcell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Theodis Brown, Sr. v. St. Louis Police Department, et al
as 13-3440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Theodis Brown, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Louis Police Department, of the City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, Homer Sayad, Charles Valier and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
