Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Javier Diaz |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 4:2021cv10578 |
| April 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| David H Hennessy |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to US Attorney by Javier Diaz. Commissioner of Social Security served on 4/16/2021, answer due 6/15/2021. (Paladino, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Javier Diaz. (Attachments: #1 PROOF OF SERVICE-COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY)(Paladino, Joseph) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered granting #6 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (King, Dawn) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered. (King, Dawn) |
| Filing 8 Online access to documents in this case is limited to counsel of record only. All documents are available for review in the Office of the Clerk. Counsel of record: please note that you will need to log into CM/ECF to access any documents in this case. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy: ORDER entered. Procedural Order re Social Security Action. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Javier Diaz.(Paladino, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT by PLAINTIFF ONLY to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Javier Diaz. (Paladino, Joseph) Modified on 4/8/2021 (King, Dawn). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 4/7/2021 Case Number 1:21-cv-10578. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester) (Jones, Sherry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by Javier Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 motion to proceed in forma pauperis)(Paladino, Joseph) (Attachment 3 replaced on 4/9/2021) (Jones, Sherry). (Attachment 4 replaced on 4/9/2021) (Jones, Sherry). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
