Magnan v. UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brendan Magnan
Defendant: UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2023cv40049
Filed: April 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Margaret R Guzman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2023 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Brendan Magnan. UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc. waiver sent on 4/20/2023, answer due 6/19/2023. (Rudolf, Benjamin)
May 9, 2023 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. District Judge Margaret R. Guzman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Finn, Mary)
May 9, 2023 Filing 5 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Rudolf, Benjamin)
April 21, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Barrows, Jennifer)
April 21, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Barrows, Jennifer)
April 20, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin C. Rudolf on behalf of Brendan Magnan (Rudolf, Benjamin)
April 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9817859 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Brendan Magnan. (Attachments: #1 Category Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rudolf, Benjamin) (Attachment 2 replaced with signed form on 4/21/2023) (Barrows, Jennifer).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Magnan v. UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brendan Magnan
Represented By: Benjamin C. Rudolf
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UMass Memorial Medical Center, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?