Potocnik v. Anoka County et al
| Brian Potocnik |
| Moorhead, City of, Minneapolis, City of, Lakeville, City of, Lake City, City of, Hoyt Lakes, City of, Hancock, City of, Golden Valley, City of, Gilbert, City of, Farmington, City of, Elk River, City of, Eagan, City of, Duluth, The City of, Dilworth, City of, Deephaven, City of, Cambridge, City of, Brooklyn Park, City of, Brooklyn Center, City of, Bloomington, City of, Biwabik, City of, Big Lake, City of, Apple Valley, City of, St. Louis County, Sherburne County, Hennepin County, Dakota County, Anoka County, New Hope, City of, New Ulm, City of, Redwood Falls, City of, Rosemount, City of, St. Paul, City of, Virginia, City of, Wells, City of, Michael Campion, Ramona Dohman, Does and John and Jane Does |
| 0:2013cv01103 |
| May 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Wright |
| David S. Doty |
| Tony N. Leung |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 3/26/2014. (PJM)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER granting 18 Motion to Dismiss; granting 31 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 31 Motion to Sever; granting 33 Motion to Dismiss; granting 35 Motion to Dismiss; granting 43 Motion to Dismiss; granting 48 Motion to Dismiss. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 2/21/2014. (PJM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
