Vaughn v. Vickers
| Quincy DelMario Vaughn |
| Leon Vickers, George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Angela Laws, Jane - Doe, Erin Escamilla, Jeff Bolten, David East, - Haas, Pam Swartz, John Doe, Clark, Smith, Nkworha, Alderman, Andrea Galbreath and Stormy Moeller |
| 2:2009cv04056 |
| March 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Cole |
| William A. Knox |
| Scott O. Wright |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING 37 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION dated September 9, 2009. It is further ORDERED that 29 plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunctive relief is denied. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 10/6/2009. (Sandridge, Susan)
|
|
Filing
37
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 29 MOTION for temporary restraining order filed by Quincy DelMario Vaughn be denied. Objections to R&R due by 9/29/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 9/9/2009. (skb)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation 12 of June 4, 2009, is adopted. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against defendants George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, and Bill Galloway are dismissed, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 7/10/2009. (Sandridge, Susan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
