Emrit v. Combs et al
Ronald Satish Emrit |
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records |
4:2024cv00181 |
March 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Beth Phillips |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 USCA Case Number from 8th Circuit Court of Appeals is 24-1735 for #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Terry, Jason) |
Filing 5 TRANSMISSION of Notice of Appeal Supplement to US Court of Appeals, 8th Circuit via electronic mail. Related document #4 Notice of Appeal. (Terry, Jason) |
Filing 4 PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #2 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ronald Satish Emrit. Filing fee $0.00. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Melvin, Greg) |
Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. (Murphy-Carr, Shauna) Modified on 3/15/2024: A copy of this Clerk's Judgment and Order (Doc. 2) were mailed via regular US Mail on 3/15/24 to Ronald Satish Emrit, 6655 38th Lane East Sarasota, FL 34243 (Cordell, Annette). |
|
Filing 1 Pro Se MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/27/2024 unless otherwise directed by the court. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)(Woods, Gloria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.