Cases 1 - 10 of 68
GARDNER v. COMBS et al
as 2:2024cv07729
Defendant:
AARON HALL, JANE DOES, UPTOWN RECORDS, MCA INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LIZA GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell v. Lucian Grainge et al
as 8:2024cv01362
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Johnson Pawnell
Defendant:
Sir Lucian Grainge, Shawn Carter, Robyn Fenty and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
McKinney v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv03931
Defendant:
Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Universal Music Entertainment Group Inc., Sean John Clothing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Defendant:
TIFFANY ARIANA TRUMP, BARACK OBAMA, MICHELLE OBAMA and others
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-3405
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Emrit v Combs, et al
as 8:2024cv01075
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LaRose v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv03464
Plaintiff:
Pshatoia LaRose
Defendant:
Sean Combs, Combs Enterprises, Sean Combs Capital and others
Emrit v. Combs
as 24-40247
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, also known as P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Emrit v. Combs, et al
as 24-3055
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, AKA P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT and ATLANTIC RECORDS, a subsidiary of Warner Music Group (WMG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
