Cases 1 - 10 of 57
English v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv05087
Plaintiff:
Adira English
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Sean John Clothing LLC, COMBS GLOBAL ENTERPRISES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
English v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv05090
Plaintiff:
Adria English
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Sean John Clothing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
McKinney v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv03931
Defendant:
Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Universal Music Entertainment Group Inc., Sean John Clothing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-3405
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 1:2024cv03624
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean P. Diddy Combs, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Emrit v Combs, et al
as 8:2024cv01075
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gonzalez v. Bad Boy Entertainment et al
as 1:2024cv03460
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Bad Boy Entertainment and CEO Sean P. Diddy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ebanks
as 24-1097
Not Yet Classified:
AHTWANA SMITH and LAKUAN EBANKS
Defendant:
ROC NATION LLC, CEO Desiree Perez, REFORM ALLIANCE, CEO Robert Rooks, DAMON DASH and others
Emrit v. Combs
as 24-40247
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sean Combs, also known as P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and Atlantic Records
Ronald Emrit v. Sean Combs, et al
as 24-1310
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant:
SEAN COMBS, aka P. Diddy, BAD BOY ENTERTAINMENT, INC. and ATLANTIC RECORDS CORP.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
