Foley et al v. University of Dayton Office of Legal Affairs et al
| Andrew W. Foley, Evan Foley and Michael Fagans |
| University of Dayton Office of Legal Affairs, Bruce Burt, Thomas Burkhardt, Harry Sweigart, Thomas Ryan, Kevin Bernhardt, Robert Babal, Eric Roth, Jonathan McCoy, Michael Sipes, Bradley Swank, Joseph Cairo, Michael R. Groff and Dylan Parfitt |
| 3:2015cv00096 |
| March 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
| Dayton Office |
| MONTGOMERY |
| Walter H Rice |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 84 Motion for Leave to Manually File Video Compact Discs- This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Motion for Leave to Manually FileVideo Compact Discs (""CD s"). For the reasons stated in the Motion, and for good cause shown, the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is hereby ORDERED to permit Defendants to manually file video CDs.. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/23/18. (kma)
|
|
Filing
75
DECISION AND ENTRY - ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 73 Report and Recommendations, Defendants' Joint Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 69 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 7/24/17. (pb)
|
|
Filing
73
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 69 Defendants' Joint MOTION to Dismiss be denied. Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington on 7-6-17. (mcm)
|
|
Filing
53
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT DYLAN PARFITT'S UNOPPOSED SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND MOTION TO LIFT STAY (DOC. # 49 ) AND UNOPPOSED MOTION OF DEFENDANT, MICHAEL GROFF, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. # 50 ) - On November 3, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio held that no cause of action exists in Ohio for negligent misidentification. Foley v. University of Dayton, --N.E.3d--, 2016-0hio-7591, 2016 WL 6519115. Given that this was the only claim asserted agai nst Defendants Dylan Parfitt and Michael Groff, the Court SUSTAINS Defendant Dylan Parfitt's Supplemental Motion for Judgment on thePleadings (Doc. # 49 ), and Motion of Defendant Michael Groff, for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. # 50 ). Both motions are unopposed.Signed by Judge Walter H. Rice on 12/6/16. (kma)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
