Cases
Hoops v. City of Kettering et al
as 3:2018cv00392
Plaintiff: Michael Hoops
Defendant: Officer Jonathan McCoy, Kettering City Of, City of Kettering, Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOGAN v. USA
as 1:2015cv01557
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JONATHAN MCCOY LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LOGAN v. USA
as 1:2015cv01556
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JONATHAN MCCOY LOGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Edwards v. University of Dayton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00260
Plaintiff: Drake A Edwards
Defendant: University of Dayton and Jonathan McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Foley et al v. University of Dayton Office of Legal Affairs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00096
Plaintiff: Andrew W. Foley , Evan Foley and Michael Fagans
Defendant: University of Dayton Office of Legal Affairs , Bruce Burt , Thomas Burkhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. McCoy et al
as 1:2015cv00692
Plaintiff: Jonathan McCoy
Defendant: Kathryn McCoy and Kathryn McCoy Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Ahmed, et al v. Porter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00101
Plaintiff: Naseem Ahmed, Tahmeena Ahmed, Gregory Anderson and others
Defendant: Anthony Porter, United Community Bank, United Community Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ahmed, et al v. Porter, et al
as 4:2008cv00047
Plaintiff: Naseem Ahmed, Tahmeena Ahmed, Gregory Anderson and others
Defendant: Anthony Porter, United Community Bank, United Community Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Ahmed, et al v. Porter, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00172
Plaintiff: Naseem Ahmed, Tahmeena Ahmed, Gregory Anderson and others
Defendant: Anthony Porter, United Community Bank, United Community Bank and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?