Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sipe v. Summit Treestands, LLC
as 3:2023cv00052
Plaintiff: Michael Sipe
Defendant: Summit Treestands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SIPES et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00773
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SIPES and CONNIE SIPES
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foley et al v. University of Dayton Office of Legal Affairs et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00096
Plaintiff: Andrew W. Foley , Evan Foley and Michael Fagans
Defendant: University of Dayton Office of Legal Affairs , Bruce Burt , Thomas Burkhardt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00755
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00758
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03221
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01969
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01807
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SIPES v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2011cv03835
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SIPES
Defendant: MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Simpson et al
as 4:2007cv00927
Plaintiff: Lavell Rondell Johnson
Defendant: John R. Simpson, Mary Jo Williams, Jay D. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?