Thunderbird v. State of Oregon et al
| Kenneth Thunderbird |
| State of Oregon, Max Williams, Mark Nooth, Snake River Medical Facility, Steve Shelton, G. Gulick, Snake River Security Department, Bassett, Cain, Hollopster, McNit, Hensley, Stringer, Adams, Sheppard, Patrick, Hodge, Griffin, V. Clark, Keller, Merrit, Hunt, Kudram, Gross, Dean, Bulilsons, Wilson, Johnston, S. Johnston, Hicks, TRCI Medical Facility, Hayes and Hansen |
| 3:2008cv01404 |
| November 24, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Umatilla |
| Paul Papak |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
235
ORDER: Adopting Findings and Recommendation 227 in its entirety. Defendant Gulick's Motion for Summary Judgment 178 is GRANTED and plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 198 , Motion for Order 207 , Motion To Compel Entry 217 , Motion to Compel 221 and Motion for a New Trial 230 are DENIED. Signed on 6/28/12 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (cib)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER: The Findings and Recommendation 148 is adopted. Defendants' Motion To Dismiss 110 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Motion for an Expert 133 ; Plaintiff's Compelling 134 , and Plaintiff's motion for default judgment 142 are DENIED.(see 2 page order for further details) Signed on 7/20/11 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (cib)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER: The Findings and Recommendation 91 is adopted. Plaintiff's filing on October 5, 2010 is construed to include an informal motion for leave to amend, and plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 90 is deemed to be properly fil ed. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 80 is denied as moot with leave to refile. Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery 87 is denied, but plaintiff is granted leave to refile if he intended the subpoena to issue to a third party and not one of the defendants in this action. Signed on 11/1/10 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (jlr)
|
|
Filing
91
Findings & Recommendation: Plaintiff's filing of October 5, 2010, should be construed as including an informal motion for leave to amend and should be granted, and the filing of October 10, 2010, should be deemed properly filed as Plaint iff's second amended complaint. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 80 should be denied as moot with leave to refile, and Plaintiff's Motion for Issuance of Subpoena 87 should be denied. Signed on 10/12/10 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motions for Reconsideration 68 & 78 , Amended Objection to the Court's Order 70 and Motion for Sanctions 74 are Denied. Signed on 4/19/10 by Magistrate Judge Paul Papak. (gm)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER: Plaintiff's Motions for Order 3 , 11 & 14 , Motion for Preliminary Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order 17 and Motion for Appointment of Counsel 5 are Denied. Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Order 31 & 32 a re Overruled. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time 34 to file an amended complaint in accordance with the Court's Order 30 is Granted. Plaintiff's amended complaint is due on or before 6/30/2009. Signed on 4/20/09 by Judge Ancer L. Haggerty. (gm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
