Marczyk v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Paul Marczyk
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2008cv00330
Filed: September 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Providence
Presiding Judge: Lincoln D. Almond
Presiding Judge: Mary M Lisi
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 8 Motion to Reverse Decision of the Commissioner; granting 9 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner. Final judgment shall enter in favor of Defendant. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 8/7/09. (Noel, Jeannine)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marczyk v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Marczyk
Represented By: James J. Gannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?