Costa v. Astrue

Costa v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Mary J. Costa
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2008cv00395
Filed:	October 23, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Rhode Island
Office:	Social Security: RSI Tax Suits Office
County:	Providence
Presiding Judge:	Lincoln D. Almond
Presiding Judge:	William E Smith
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 15, 2009	Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Report and Recommendations, Granting 11 Motion to Reverse Decision of the Commissioner filed by Mary J. Costa, and Denying 13 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner filed by Michael J. Astrue. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 10/15/2009. (Smith, Rana)
September 28, 2009	Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Commissioner's Motion for an Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner (Document No. 13) be DENIED and that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner (Document No. 11) be GRANTED. Recommending that the District Court enter Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff remanding this case for additional administrative proceedings consistent with this decision. 11 First MOTION to Reverse Decision of the Commissioner filed by Mary J. Costa, 13 MOTION to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner filed by Michael J. Astrue Objections to R&R due by 10/13/2009. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/28/09. (Noel, Jeannine)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 15, 2009

Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 14 Report and Recommendations, Granting 11 Motion to Reverse Decision of the Commissioner filed by Mary J. Costa, and Denying 13 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner filed by Michael J. Astrue. So Ordered by Judge William E. Smith on 10/15/2009. (Smith, Rana)

September 28, 2009

Filing 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Commissioner's Motion for an Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner (Document No. 13) be DENIED and that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner (Document No. 11) be GRANTED. Recommending that the District Court enter Final Judgment in favor of Plaintiff remanding this case for additional administrative proceedings consistent with this decision. 11 First MOTION to Reverse Decision of the Commissioner filed by Mary J. Costa, 13 MOTION to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner filed by Michael J. Astrue Objections to R&R due by 10/13/2009. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/28/09. (Noel, Jeannine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Costa v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary J. Costa
Represented By:	Donna M. Nesselbush
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?