McGrath v. Astrue

Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff: Melody-Ann McGrath
Case Number: 1:2012cv00498
Filed: July 9, 2012
Court: Rhode Island District Court
Office: Providence Office
County: Providence
Referring Judge: Lincoln D. Almond
Presiding Judge: Ronald R. Lagueux
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 18, 2013 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge Lincoln D. Almond on 9/18/13 is accepted. Plaintiff's motion to reverse the decision of the Commissioner is denied, and Defendant's Motion to Affirm that decision is granted. So Ordered by Senior Judge Ronald R. Lagueux on 12/18/13. (Cavaco, Janice) Modified on 12/18/2013 (Cavaco, Janice).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Rhode Island District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGrath v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melody-Ann McGrath
Represented By: David B. Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.