Martin v. Rainey et al
Sidney Patrick Martin |
Swiney, Gilbert, Randall Mathena, McDuffie, Trent, Ms. R. Rainey, Tate, Jeff Kiser, Eldridge, A. Younce, P. Collins, Ms. Scarberry, Gallihar, J. Artrip, L. Collins, Duncan, McCowan, Huff, Marcus Elam, Jeffrey Kiser and Mr. Cauthorne |
7:2020cv00253 |
April 28, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Elizabeth K Dillon |
Joel C Hoppe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by Sidney Patrick Martin (slt) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 against J. Artrip, Cauthorne, L. Collins, P. Collins, Duncan, Marcus Elam, Eldridge, Gallihar, Gilbert, Huff, Jeff Kiser, Jeffrey Kiser, Randall Mathena, McCowan, McDuffie, R. Rainey, Scarberry, Swiney, Tate, Trent, A. Younce, filed by Sidney Patrick Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(slt) |
Filing 1 ORDER directing the Clerk to docket this order in a new civil action with the same style, and to docket and conditionally file Martin's proposed amended complaint and exhibits (7:19cv00577; Dkt. Nos. 13-1, 13-2) as his complaint in the new action. The Clerk shall also file Martin's notice of change of address (7:19cv00577; Dkt. No. 14) and ensure that this order and all subsequent orders are mailed to him at his proper address. Signed by Judge Elizabeth K. Dillon on 4/28/2020. (slt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.