Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Norel Ward v. Jeff Kiser
as 23-6349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOREL S. WARD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JEFF KISER, Red Onion State Prison, SGT. MASSINGILL, MR. BLEDSOE and others
Deonta Hicks v. Jeff Kiser
as 22-7246
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEONTA JEROME HICKS
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF KISER, C/O ROBINETTE, SHANNON FULLER, Assistant Warden and others
Hicks v. Kiser et al
as 7:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
Deonta Jerome Hicks
Defendant:
Jeff Kiser, C/O Robinette, Shannon Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenzo Ferebee v. Karen Stapleton
as 20-7206
Defendant / Appellee:
KAREN STAPLETON, Virginia Department of Corrections Offender Disciplinary Manager, LARRY MULLINS, Institutional Hearing Officer Red Onion State Prison, E. A. MILLER, Lieutenant Red Onion State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENZA GERALD FEREBEE, JR.
Martin v. Rainey et al
as 7:2020cv00253
Defendant:
Swiney, Gilbert, Randall Mathena and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Patrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Barton et al
as 7:2020cv00120
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Jeff Kiser, Sgt. M. B. Barton and C/O Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Kiser et al
as 7:2020cv00036
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Warden Jeff Kiser, Sgt Fliming, Sgt. Massingill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Rainey et al
as 7:2019cv00577
Defendant:
Swiney, Gilbert, Randall Mathena and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Patrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferebee v. Stapleton et al
as 7:2019cv00254
Defendant:
Larry A. Mullins, S. M. Sifford, Karen Stapleton and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenza Gerald Ferebee, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sibley v. Mullins et al
as 7:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Regional Ombudsman, J. Messer, Jeff Kiser and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Eugene Sibley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
