Miller v. Ballard et al
| Andrew Miller |
| David Ballard, Jim Rubenstein, David Miller, John Doe and Matheny |
| 2:2014cv16868 |
| October 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Charleston Office |
| Fayette |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Dwane L. Tinsley |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendants' 145 second Motion for Summary Judgment and denying plaintiff's 178 cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 12/12/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER adopting and incorporating the 129 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge in full except to the extent that the court must correct two minor factual errors contained in the report, as set forth more fully herein; granti ng in part and denying in part the defendants' 116 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting said motion as to the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Miller, Ward, and Blagg regarding the plaintiff's placement in the restraint chair on 11/19/2013; denying the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment in all other respects; denying the plaintiff's 118 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 127 , and 128 Motions for Summary Judgment or to Rule on Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/13/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER the reference of these specific motions herein to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn; granting in part and denying in part the defendants' 80 MOTION to Dismiss; granting said motion with regard to the plaintiff 's claims for monetary damage against all of the defendants in their official capacities, all of the claims against defendants Ballard and Rubenstein, and the plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief as contained in the Ame nded Complaint; denying said motion with regard to the plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Penick in his individual capacity; denying the plaintiff's 88 MOTION to Rule on Summary Judgment; and denying the plaintiff's 92 MOTION to Grant Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 3/4/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (taq)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER accepting and incorporating the 72 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge; denying without prejudice the defendants' 21 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/3/2015. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party; Magistrate Judge Tinsley) (taq)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
