Cases 1 - 10 of 358
Danny Hopper v. Brandon Chancey, et al
as 24-3407
Defendant:
Attorney Trey Bryant, Public Defender Michael Raby, Judge Mike Medlock and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
(PS) Rodriguez v. Belingheri et al
as 2:2024cv02538
Defendant:
Braulio Munoz, Maria Oropeza, Susan Belingheri and others
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Alexander Randles
as 24-12917
Respondent:
BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT CUSTODIAL AGENT, P. DAVID MATHENY, L. D. OWEN, III and others
Petitioner:
In re: ALEXANDER RANDLES
Smith v. Choi et al
as 2:2024cv11677
Defendant:
Amanda Dugan, John Doe, Kayla Stark-Matheny and others
Plaintiff:
Larry David Smith
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garces v. Matheny et al
as 1:2024cv00290
Defendant:
Suite St. John, Richard Matheny, Suite St. John at Gallows Point and others
Plaintiff:
Rolando Garces
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
MATHENY v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02447
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
JUDY MATHENY
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Maguinuss et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Thomas
Defendant:
Evon Maguinuss, Liz Hodge, Jackie Matheny, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ball v. Campbell County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Defendant:
Campbell County Sheriff, Campbell County Board of County Commissioners, Scott Matheny and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
