Wilson v. Frame et al
| Stephen Wilson |
| SRT Team Officers, Two (2) as-yet unidentified, Jonathan Frame, Scott Smith, Richard Toney, Mike Buzzard, Andrew Hill and Ryan Hill |
| 2:2019cv00103 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 LETTER to Stephen Wilson, from Clerk of Court, USDC/SDWV, dated 3/29/2019, re: response to #5 letter and enclosing a copy of the docket sheet. (taq) |
| Filing 5 LETTER to Clerk of Court, from Stephen Wilson dated 3/21/2019, re: status of civil action. (taq) |
| Filing 4 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION by Stephen Wilson in support of #2 Complaint, re: named defendants and last-known addresses for service. (Attachment: #1 Mailing Envelope) (taq) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (kp) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Mailing Envelope) (kp) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Stephen Wilson to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (Attachment: #1 Resident Transaction Details) (kp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
