Cases 41 - 50 of 33,429
Koroma v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Konbeh Koroma
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Brett Turley, Stephen Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waldrep #309512 v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2024cv01303
Petitioner:
Roger Darryl Waldrep
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marquez v. Damoui
as 4:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Marquez
Defendant:
Shahin Damoui
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Thornell et al
as 4:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Fabian Ortiz
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson #337823 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08104
Petitioner:
Gerald Richardson
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bender v. Unknown Party
as 2:2024cv01248
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Unknown Parties
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bender
Defendant:
Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnston #353566 v. Sierra et al
as 2:2024cv01217
Plaintiff:
Chastity Bree Johnston
Defendant:
Unknown Sierra and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West #357723 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2024cv01225
Petitioner:
Robert West
Respondent:
Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown #246795 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Robbie W Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Sharon Joshua and Naphcare Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
