Cases 41 - 50 of 77,193
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Witherspoon v. Weber
as 1:2024cv01084
Petitioner:
Edward Witherspoon
Respondent:
Warden Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dingle v. USA 2255
as 1:2024cv01657
Petitioner:
Donte Lamont Dingle
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01661
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wilson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Demiqou Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Msp. Trooper D et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Defendant:
G.T.L., Msp. Trooper D, Sgt. Hunt and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Tapia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bazemore v. MCIJ Maryland Institution Jessup
as 1:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Devonte Bazemore
Defendant:
MCIJ Maryland Institution Jessup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blalock v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2024cv01637
Plaintiff:
Breeana Blalock
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedures Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Tisha Powell
as 1:2024cv01633
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Tisha Powell doing business as Oasis Night Club
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
