Cases 21 - 30 of 34
MICHAELSON v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv05722
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MICHAELSON
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BOVE v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv05727
Plaintiff:
DENISE BOVE
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MAXA v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
AARON MAXA
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
ACETO v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv05663
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ACETO
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
MARIE et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05541
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MARIE, SHARLA HILBURN and NANCY COX
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
DAINES et al v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05359
Plaintiff:
TORY DAINES and SARAH BABB
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Crocco v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv05281
Plaintiff:
Matthew Crocco
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
MELKOWSKI v. APPLE INC.
as 2:2024cv04827
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MELKOWSKI
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Davidson et al v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2018mc00033
Petitioner:
Thomas Davidson , Todd Cleary , Eric Siegal and others
Respondent:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
In re: Intel Corporation
as 1:2005md01717
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Phil Paul
3Rd Party Defendant:
Apple Inc. and Ingram Micro Inc.
Defendant:
Avnet, Inc. and Clerk Jeffery N. Luthi
Not Yet Classified:
Nancy Wolfe, Charles Dupraz, Brian Weiner and others
Petitioner:
The National Plaintiffs Group
Intervenor:
Dow Jones & Co., Inc., Computer & Communications Industry Association, New York Times Company and others
Special Master:
SPECIAL MASTER Vincent J. Poppiti, -SM-
In Re:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
