Cases 121 - 130 of 50,449
FLYNN v. ACTING WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2024cv00617
Petitioner:
KELSIE GENE FLYNN
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GERMANY v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
TYRONE GERMANY
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, MICHELLE A. HENRY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Prime Care Medical
as 1:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Christine Gibbs
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: DAVID TURNER
as 2:2024cv02546
Petitioner:
DAVID TURNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MORRISON v. WASHINGTON
as 2:2024cv02531
Petitioner:
WILLIAM MORRISON
Respondent:
M WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WATTS et al v. TATE et al
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
JOHN WATTS, TRAYVON J. TUMER, ELIJAH GIORDINA and others
Defendant:
ABBIE TATE, SHAUN EDMUNSON, BRENDA MATTHEWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: LUKE D. LATSON
as 2:2024cv02549
Plaintiff:
LUKE D. LATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOMBARDO v. EVANS et al
as 5:2024cv01999
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY LOMBARDO
Defendant:
BRANDON T. EVANS, JENNA MARIE PLISZAR, KEVIN SAMUEL SANTOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
