Cases 41 - 50 of 443,245
Adams et al v. Cavazos et al
as 5:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Adams and Stephanie Staubitz
Defendant:
Mayra Cavazos, Rachael Vasquez, Julia Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galindo v. Midland Police Department et al
as 7:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
David Galindo
Defendant:
Midland Police Department, Magistrate Judge and Midland Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Caterpillar, Inc.
as 6:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dewayne Washington, Jr.
Defendant:
Caterpillar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Permenter v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Permenter
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Anderson v. Xtreme Manufacturing, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Matthew Anderson
Defendant:
Xtreme Manufacturing, LLC and SKL Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ryerson et al v. Bank of America, NA
as 4:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alberto Ryerson, Ryerson & Associates, PC and Rocky Paolo
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Garza v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Alma Laura Garza
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Robertson v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2024cv02174
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Robertson
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 American Disabilities Act of 1990
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02172
Petitioner:
Jasper Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
