Cases 1 - 10 of 33,001
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 5:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Warden Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Federal Marshals, et al.
as 4:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Federal Marshals, Northeast Ohio Correction Center, Paul E. Bonanno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schaffer v. Hudgens et al
as 3:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Harold Schaffer
Defendant:
Caleb Hudgens, Steven White, Madison Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Core Civic
as 3:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry et al v. Foreman et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry and Unamed Plaintiff(s)
Defendant:
M. Foreman, Annette Chambers-Smith, N. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kagan Cole Bixler
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newland v. Uhl et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Keith Newland
Defendant:
Adam Uhl and Covington Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Machelle Pearson, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1526
Plaintiff:
MACHELLE PEARSON, MARIA SHELDON, KESHUNA ABCUMBY and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, SHAWN BREWER and others
Machelle Pearson, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1528
Plaintiff:
MACHELLE PEARSON, MARIA SHELDON, KESHUNA ABCUMBY and others
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CARMEN MCINTYRE and JAMES BLESSMAN
Burnett v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Terrance Burnett
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
