Cases 21 - 30 of 5,525
Moss v. Miller County Detention Center
as 4:2024cv04095
Petitioner:
Dacorey Moss
Respondent:
Miller County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medcalf v. Evans
as 6:2024cv06120
Plaintiff:
William G Medcalf
Defendant:
Travis Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders v. Tripp et al
as 1:2024cv01061
Plaintiff:
Kenderick Loray Sanders
Defendant:
Jailer Joseph Tripp, Jailer Tyler Poole and Jail Administrator Gene Segar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franks v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv02115
Defendant:
Deputy Zachary King, John Doe Officers, Chief of Police Josh Winford and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrill v. Evans et al
as 3:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Donald Merrill
Defendant:
Evans, Mills and Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Worley et al
as 1:2024cv01060
Defendant:
Captain Lisa Worley and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Plaintiff:
Raymond Douglas Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muldrew v. Ghormley et al
as 4:2024cv04093
Defendant:
Karen Ghormley and Sheriff Steven Otwell
Plaintiff:
Quartauis Demontez Muldrew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Wise
as 4:2024cv04094
Defendant:
Deputy Eddie Joe Wise
Plaintiff:
Aaron Jesse Lewis and AJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Kittrell et al
as 6:2024cv06119
Defendant:
Dr. Kittrell, Dana Haynes, S. Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Stafford et al
as 1:2024cv01059
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Lisa Worthly, Nurse Cassey Stafford and Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Plaintiff:
Joe Frank Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
