Cases 71 - 80 of 2,316
DAVIS v. BROWN
as 1:2023cv00458
Petitioner:
REGINALD LAMAR DAVIS
Respondent:
WARDEN BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRIZZEL v. SURRY COUNTY DISTRICT COURT et al
as 1:2023cv00442
Petitioner:
NYAMBER GRIZZEL
Respondent:
SURRY COUNTY DISTRICT COURT and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MOSLEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2023cv00443
Petitioner:
FRANKLIN JAMES MOSLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURPHY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00377
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAVERNE MURPHY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MOORE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00383
Petitioner:
JERRELL MOORE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CAPPS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00375
Petitioner:
LORREE ANN CAPPS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MEYERS v. SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 1:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
DAVID MEYERS
Respondent:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRAY v. LOVETTE
as 1:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
DQUAN D. GRAY
Defendant:
WARDEN LOVETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BRIGHT v. BUREAU OF PRISON
as 1:2023cv00332
Petitioner:
ALTON BRIGHT
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BECOAT v. HECKARD
as 1:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
MARTRES DEJOHN BECOAT
Respondent:
K. HECKARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
