Cases 21 - 30 of 26,230
Bobo v. Nahirnyy et al
as 2:2024cv02701
Defendant:
Timothy Nahirnyy and DRN Finished Carpentry, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yumiko Bobo
Unknown:
Jamita Swearengen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01209
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Toney v. Harison
as 2:2024cv02697
Respondent:
Warden C. Harison
Petitioner:
Genard Alonzo Toney, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodall v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02698
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Lt Jones, Lt Varnes and others
Plaintiff:
Tacy Woodall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Bonner
as 2:2024cv02699
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummer v. Parsons et al
as 1:2024cv01210
Defendant:
Anna Parsons, LR Thomas, FNU Strickland and others
Plaintiff:
Labatrich Drummer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wing v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wing
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Merriweather v. Shelby County Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv02717
Defendant:
Chief Jailer Kirk Fields, Shelby County Justice Center and Johnson
Plaintiff:
Demerion Charles Earl Merriweather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beauford v. Riems et al
as 2:2024cv02695
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Beauford
Defendant:
Jeffrey Riems, John Does 1-10 and EAN Holdings, LLC d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Williams v. Shelby County Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv02687
Defendant:
Sgt Buford and Shelby County Justice Center
Plaintiff:
Derrico Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
