Cases 1 - 10 of 6,063
WILLIAMS v. AULD et al
as 1:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
JAY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Hendon v. Hayes et al
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Valchic Wendell Hendon
Defendant:
FNU Hayes, FNU Baker, FNU Cramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03155
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Todd Ishee and Edward F. Basden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAIRSTON v. THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JIWAN HAIRSTON
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Butler v. North Carolina General Court of Justice et al
as 5:2024ct03151
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
North Carolina General Court of Justice and Lisa Scales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gause v. Covington et al
as 3:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
Walter T. Gause
Defendant:
Ronald Covington, FNU Nealey, FNU Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belfield v. Honeycut et al
as 5:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rashawn Belfield
Defendant:
FNU Honeycut, FNU Metcalf, FNU Sims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Columbus County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2024ct03147
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dale Richardson
Defendant:
Columbus County Sheriff's Office and Jail Detention Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Kenneth
as 5:2024ct03145
Plaintiff:
Darnell William King
Defendant:
Kay Kenneth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
