Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Haynesworth v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 2:2017cv03247
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Haynesworth
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions , South Carolina Department of Mental Health, C Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danao v. Poholchuk et al
as 0:2017cv02853
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Danao
Defendant:
Kimberly Poholchuk and Cynthia Helff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Chivas et al
as 1:2017cv02819
Plaintiff:
Andres L. Glenn
Defendant:
Daren Chivas, James Mahammad, Deberh Porkwine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Porkwine et al
as 1:2017cv02553
Plaintiff:
Andres Glenn
Defendant:
Deberh Porkwine, James Mahamad and Deron Chives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Columbia Care Center et al
as 8:2017cv02455
Plaintiff:
Robert Holloway, Jr
Defendant:
Columbia Care Center, Dr Martinez and Courtney Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Coffey et al
as 1:2017cv01768
Plaintiff:
Andres L. Glenn
Defendant:
Felehia Coffey, James Cocran, Benchers Early and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chieves v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 6:2017cv01717
Plaintiff:
Darrine Nathaniel Chieves
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Greenville County Detention Center, Probate Court of Darlington County SC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamm v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 9:2017cv01702
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions , Timothy Budz , Shelia Lindsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
as 4:2017cv00922
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Davis
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions and Stephanie Harry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamm v. Bogel et al
as 9:2017cv00809
Plaintiff:
Michael E Hamm
Defendant:
NFN Bogel, Jr , Nikki Haley , John Magill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
