Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 30,676
DAVIS v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff: OMAR DAVIS
Defendant: MARK MURRAY and WOLKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff: MYRON S. PRUDEN, MARK C.O. COOK, SHANE C. HENDRICK and others
Defendant: W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCROGHAM v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant: FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Mitchell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Tiger A Rogers
Defendant: Mekel Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCROGHAM v. DUNAWAY et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant: DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and DANGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franze v. Capper et al
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff: Brandon J Franze
Defendant: Brandon Capper, Jimmy Heflin and Nick Barry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ECKELBARGER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01002
Petitioner: TREVOR L. ECKELBARGER
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENRY v. VERMILLION COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv00305
Plaintiff: JUSTIN HENRY
Defendant: VERMILLION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HULSEY v. GARDENER et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff: CLINTON HULSEY
Defendant: DELANA GARDENER, CENTURION MEDICAL, BECKY ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAYLOR v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: JAMES SAYLOR
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH, JOHN DOE, MADISON GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?