Cases 31 - 40 of 17,457
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02489
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keith v. Warden
as 1:2024cv02490
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Keith
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Corizon/Yes Care et al
as 1:2024cv02488
Defendant:
Medical Services, Richard Roderick, Jeffrey Nines and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Razaq v. Federal Bureau Prisons et al
as 8:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
Khalid Razaq
Defendant:
Federal Bureau Prisons and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv02478
Respondent:
Prince Georges County and State of Maryland
Petitioner:
Kyeem King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Queen v. Pesterfield et al
as 1:2024cv02476
Defendant:
David Greer, Walt Pesterfield, Hilary Siakor-Sirleaf and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Lee Queen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Ghaler et al
as 1:2024cv02475
Plaintiff:
Wesley Lyons
Defendant:
Sheriff Jeffrey R. Ghaler and Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cornish v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv02443
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eaton Cornish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Allen
as 1:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Keishon Thompson
Defendant:
Melvin L. Allen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
