Cases 41 - 50 of 30,698
SAYLOR v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
JAMES SAYLOR
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, JOHN DOE, MADISON GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCROGHAM v. DUNAWAY et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant:
DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and DANGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant:
SMITH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWLISON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ROWLISON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GLENN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BECKWITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
TYLER BECKWITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
DANIEL SMITH
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LONAS v. BURKHART
as 1:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
KIRK LONAS
Defendant:
BRAD BURKHART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Justise v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Charles E Justise, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
